Hybrid immunity improves the immune response after fourth Covid-19 vaccine dose in individuals with medical conditions predisposing to severe Covid-19 (preprint)

BackgroundData on Covid-19 booster vaccinations and subsequent infections on immune responses in the immunocompromised is limited. We studied antibody responses after the fourth dose and subsequent breakthrough infection to define patient groups benefiting most from boosters. MethodsIn Finland, fourth vaccine (booster) doses were first recommended for severely immunocompromised individuals, whom we invited to participate in 2022. We assessed spike protein specific IgG antibody levels and neutralizing antibodies (NAb) against the ancestral and Omicron BA.1 strains one month after the fourth dose from 488 adult participants and compared to the levels of 35 healthy controls after 3 doses. We used Bayesian generalized linear modelling to assess factors explaining antibody concentrations after the fourth dose. We assessed vaccine-induced and hybrid immunity six months after the last vaccine dose. ResultsChronic kidney disease (CKD) and immunosuppressive therapy (IT) were identified as factors explaining sub-optimal antibody responses. The proportion of participants with a normal antibody response and NAbs were significantly lower in CKD patients as compared to controls. By the 6-month sampling one third of the participants became infected, which enhanced antibody levels notably in most immunocompromised participants. ConclusionsImpaired antibody responses, especially NAbs against the Omicron lineage, predict limited protection in individuals with CKD, and highlight the need for alternative pharmaceutical preventive strategies. Vaccination strategies should take into account development of robust hybrid immunity responses also among the immunocompromised.

Persistent T cell-mediated immune responses against Omicron variants after the third COVID-19 mRNA vaccine dose (preprint)

The prime-boost COVID-19 mRNA vaccination strategy has proven to be effective against severe COVID-19 disease and death. However, concerns have been raised due to decreasing neutralizing antibody levels after COVID-19 vaccination and due to the emergence of new immuno-evasive SARS-CoV-2 variants that may require additional booster vaccinations. Here we show that within the vaccinated health care workers (HCWs) the third mRNA vaccine dose recalls both humoral and T cell-mediated immune responses and induces high levels of neutralizing antibodies against Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 variants. Three weeks after the third vaccine dose, SARS-CoV-2 wild type spike protein-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are observed in 82% and 71% of HCWs, respectively, and the T cells cross-recognize both Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 spike peptides. Although the levels of neutralizing antibodies against Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 decline 2.5 to 3.8-fold three months after the third dose, Th1-type memory CD4+ T cell responses are maintained for at least 7 months post the second dose and 3 months post the third vaccine dose suggesting durable immune protection.

High secondary attack rate and persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in household transmission study participants, Finland 2020 (preprint)

Background Household transmission studies offer the opportunity to assess both secondary attack rate and persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies over time. Methods We invited confirmed COVID-19 cases and their household members to attend up to four household visits with collection of nasopharyngeal and serum samples over 28 days after index case onset. We calculated secondary attack rates (SAR) based on the presence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein IgG antibodies (IgG Ab) and/or neutralizing antibodies (NAb) overall and per households. Three and six months later, we assessed the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Findings We recruited 39 index cases and 90 household members. Among 87 household members evaluated, SAR was 48% (n=42), including 37 symptomatic secondary cases. In total, 80/129 (62%) participants developed both IgG Ab and NAb, while three participants only developed IgG Ab. Among participants who had both IgG Ab and NAb during the initial follow-up, 68/69 (99%) and 63/70 (90%) had IgG Ab and NAb at 3 months, while at 6 months, 59/75 (79%) and 63/75 (84%) had IgG Ab and NAb, respectively. Participants who required hospital care had initially 5-fold IgG Ab concentrations compared to cases with mild symptoms and 8-fold compared to asymptomatic cases. Interpretation Following detection of a COVID-19 case in a household, other members had a high risk of becoming infected. Follow-up of participants showed strong persistence of antibodies in most cases. Funding This study was supported by THL coordinated funding for COVID-19 research (Finnish Government's supplementary budget) and by the Academy of Finland (Decision number 336431).

High Secondary Attack Rate and Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Household Transmission Study Participants, Finland 2020 (preprint)

Background: Household transmission studies offer the opportunity to assess both secondary attack rate and persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies over time.Methods: We invited confirmed COVID-19 cases and their household members to attend up to four household visits with collection of nasopharyngeal and serum samples over 28 days after index case onset. We calculated secondary attack rates (SAR) based on the presence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein IgG antibodies (IgG Ab) and/or neutralizing antibodies (NAb) overall and per households. Three and six months later, we assessed the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.Findings: We recruited 39 index cases and 90 household members. Among 87 household members evaluated, SAR was 48% (n=42), including 37 symptomatic secondary cases. In total, 80/129 (62%) participants developed both IgG Ab and NAb, while three participants only developed IgG Ab. Among participants who had both IgG Ab and NAb during the initial follow-up, 68/69 (99%) and 63/70 (90%) had IgG Ab and NAb at 3 months, while at 6 months, 59/75 (79%) and 63/75 (84%) had IgG Ab and NAb, respectively. Participants who required hospital care had initially 5-fold IgG Ab concentrations compared to cases with mild symptoms and 8-fold compared to asymptomatic cases.Interpretation: Following detection of a COVID-19 case in a household, other members had a high risk of becoming infected. Follow-up of participants showed strong persistence of antibodies in most cases.Funding Information: This study was supported by THL coordinated funding for COVID-19 research (Finnish Government’s supplementary budget) and by the Academy of Finland (Decision number 336431).Declaration of Interests: THL has received research funding for studies not related to COVID-19 from GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines (NE, CV, AAP and MM as investigators), Pfizer (AAP) and Sanofi Pasteur (AAP). Other authors have no competing interests.Ethics Approval Statement: The Finnish communicable diseases law and the law on the duties of the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare allowed the implementation of the initial household transmission study and 3 months convalescent sample collection without seeking further institutional ethical review11,12. The protocol for the follow-up visits at 6 months was reviewed and approved by the HUS ethical committee and registered under the Development of seroprevalence in Finland during the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic – serological population study protocol HUS/1137/2020. Informed consent was obtained from all cases and contacts or their parents or legal guardian before any procedure was performed.